Modular Solution for Cosmetics Compliance
Check the Conformity of your Formulas
Secure your regulatory documents for each zone
Optimize on-site risk management
Manage your Safety Data Sheets efficiently
Automate your regulatory monitoring
Ensure the traceability of your substances
Maintain good HSE risk management
The FDA proposes a rule requiring standardized testing methods to detect asbestos in talc-containing cosmetic products. A key step under MoCRA.
Recevez une fois par mois les dernières actus réglementaires et conseils d’experts.
A recent study published in Frontiers in Toxicology assessed the application of the essential use concept to substances of very high concern (SVHCs) under the REACH.
ECHA’s recent findings reveal gaps in cosmetics compliance with REACH and POP standards, highlighting high-risk chemicals like cyclic siloxanes and perfluorinated compounds. For the cosmetics industry, staying informed on regulatory shifts is critical to ensuring safety, sustainability, and consumer trust.
The EU's revised Detergent Regulation introduces new standards for safety, traceability, and biodegradability, supporting a greener market. Find out how these changes impact detergent compliance.
The active substance prallethrin has been approved for PT18, with an effective date of March 1, 2026. This new regulation requires market players to urgently prepare a market authorization (MA) dossier to continue selling their products, under penalty of withdrawal from the market.
The EU tightens restrictions on hexavalent chromium for decorative uses. New requirements encourage substitution, with a potential REACH restriction on CrVI under review, aiming for adoption by late 2026.
Over the past decade, the cosmetics industry has faced increasing pressure to eliminate animal testing from all stages of product development. Both the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) have long established comprehensive bans on animal testing for cosmetics. However, recent developments in regulatory practices—particularly the intersection between cosmetics regulations and broader chemical safety rules like REACH are sparking new debates. While the bans remain firmly in place, the fine line between the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) and REACH has led to legal cases and calls for further clarification.
