
Artificial intelligence (AI) is profoundly transforming the way brands create content, communicate about their products and increase their visibility among consumers.
With the rise of ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and AI-generated answers in Google, search strategies are evolving. It is no longer simply a matter of ranking among the top results in a traditional search engine, but also of becoming a sufficiently relevant and reliable source of information to be referenced or cited by artificial intelligence systems.
This development represents a major opportunity for cosmetic brands, but it also raises an essential question: how can brands produce content optimised for artificial intelligence while ensuring regulatory compliance?
Although AI can accelerate the production of marketing content, it does not release brands from their obligations regarding truthfulness, claim substantiation and consumer protection.
For many years, digital visibility strategies have primarily relied on SEO (Search Engine Optimization), which aims to improve the ranking of web pages in traditional search engines.
Today, with the development of AI, new concepts are emerging, including GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) and AEO (Answer Engine Optimization).
Consider the example of a consumer looking for a cream suitable for sensitive skin.
With a traditional search, the consumer visits several websites and compares products. With an AI assistant, they can ask directly: “Which ingredients should I look for in a cream for sensitive skin, and which products meet these criteria?”
The system can then compile information from various sources and, depending on how it operates, cite certain brands or pieces of content.
For cosmetic companies, the quality of published information is therefore becoming a key issue for both visibility and credibility.
Product descriptions, e-commerce listings, social media posts, blog articles, advertising campaigns and translations: generative AI tools can support many stages of a brand’s communication strategy.
They can save time, adapt messages to different audiences and rapidly produce content in multiple languages.
However, AI systems can also generate information that is inaccurate, exaggerated or insufficiently supported.
In the cosmetics sector, these errors can have regulatory consequences.
For example, an AI tool could transform a cautious statement such as “helps improve the appearance of the skin” into “repairs skin cells”. It could also claim that an ingredient guarantees clinically proven efficacy when no study supports that statement for the finished product.
From a marketing perspective, the difference may appear minor. From a regulatory perspective, however, it can be decisive.
Google itself recommends manually reviewing the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated content before publication.
AI-generated content is not necessarily compliant content.
In Europe, cosmetic claims are governed in particular by Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and Regulation (EU) No 655/2013.
The latter establishes six common criteria with which claims must comply:
These requirements apply to claims regardless of the medium used, including packaging, advertisements, websites, social media and other forms of commercial communication.
The way in which content is produced does not alter these obligations. Whether a product description is written by an employee, a marketing agency or an artificial intelligence system, the claims it contains must remain compliant and adequately substantiated.
Example: when AI amplifies a cosmetic claim
Initial claim: “Helps reduce the appearance of wrinkles.”
AI-generated reformulation: “Eliminates wrinkles and regenerates skin cells.”
The second statement introduces stronger promises that may not be supported by the available evidence and may raise questions regarding the product’s regulatory classification.
A claim must therefore do more than sound convincing or support search visibility. It must also be consistent with the product’s characteristics and the available supporting evidence.
Particular care should be taken with terms such as “hypoallergenic”, “clinically proven”, “dermatologically tested” and “free from harmful substances”, as well as claims relating to the biological effects of a product.
With the development of generative artificial intelligence and new search engines, cosmetic brands face a dual challenge: strengthening their digital visibility while ensuring the regulatory compliance of the content they publish.
Regulations make no distinction between content written by a marketing team, produced by a communications agency or generated by artificial intelligence. Cosmetic claims must remain accurate, substantiated and compliant with the requirements of the markets in which the products are sold.
EcoMundo helps cosmetic brands secure their communications by ensuring that messages published on packaging, e-commerce websites, social media and advertising materials comply with the applicable regulations.
Drawing on its expertise in cosmetic regulations and claim assessment, EcoMundo helps companies combine marketing performance, digital innovation and regulatory compliance.
In an environment where content is created and published at an increasingly rapid pace, integrating regulatory compliance from the design stage helps limit the risk of misleading communications, reduce corrections after publication and protect brand credibility.
Compliance therefore becomes an essential component of a sustainable digital communication strategy, alongside SEO and GEO initiatives.
With EcoMundo, brands benefit from a regulatory partner that can secure their claims and marketing content while supporting their development across international markets. Contact us so you can comply too!
Artificial intelligence (AI) is profoundly transforming the way brands create content, communicate about their products and increase their visibility among consumers.
With the rise of ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and AI-generated answers in Google, search strategies are evolving. It is no longer simply a matter of ranking among the top results in a traditional search engine, but also of becoming a sufficiently relevant and reliable source of information to be referenced or cited by artificial intelligence systems.
This development represents a major opportunity for cosmetic brands, but it also raises an essential question: how can brands produce content optimised for artificial intelligence while ensuring regulatory compliance?
Although AI can accelerate the production of marketing content, it does not release brands from their obligations regarding truthfulness, claim substantiation and consumer protection.
For many years, digital visibility strategies have primarily relied on SEO (Search Engine Optimization), which aims to improve the ranking of web pages in traditional search engines.
Today, with the development of AI, new concepts are emerging, including GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) and AEO (Answer Engine Optimization).
Consider the example of a consumer looking for a cream suitable for sensitive skin.
With a traditional search, the consumer visits several websites and compares products. With an AI assistant, they can ask directly: “Which ingredients should I look for in a cream for sensitive skin, and which products meet these criteria?”
The system can then compile information from various sources and, depending on how it operates, cite certain brands or pieces of content.
For cosmetic companies, the quality of published information is therefore becoming a key issue for both visibility and credibility.
Product descriptions, e-commerce listings, social media posts, blog articles, advertising campaigns and translations: generative AI tools can support many stages of a brand’s communication strategy.
They can save time, adapt messages to different audiences and rapidly produce content in multiple languages.
However, AI systems can also generate information that is inaccurate, exaggerated or insufficiently supported.
In the cosmetics sector, these errors can have regulatory consequences.
For example, an AI tool could transform a cautious statement such as “helps improve the appearance of the skin” into “repairs skin cells”. It could also claim that an ingredient guarantees clinically proven efficacy when no study supports that statement for the finished product.
From a marketing perspective, the difference may appear minor. From a regulatory perspective, however, it can be decisive.
Google itself recommends manually reviewing the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated content before publication.
AI-generated content is not necessarily compliant content.
In Europe, cosmetic claims are governed in particular by Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and Regulation (EU) No 655/2013.
The latter establishes six common criteria with which claims must comply:
These requirements apply to claims regardless of the medium used, including packaging, advertisements, websites, social media and other forms of commercial communication.
The way in which content is produced does not alter these obligations. Whether a product description is written by an employee, a marketing agency or an artificial intelligence system, the claims it contains must remain compliant and adequately substantiated.
Example: when AI amplifies a cosmetic claim
Initial claim: “Helps reduce the appearance of wrinkles.”
AI-generated reformulation: “Eliminates wrinkles and regenerates skin cells.”
The second statement introduces stronger promises that may not be supported by the available evidence and may raise questions regarding the product’s regulatory classification.
A claim must therefore do more than sound convincing or support search visibility. It must also be consistent with the product’s characteristics and the available supporting evidence.
Particular care should be taken with terms such as “hypoallergenic”, “clinically proven”, “dermatologically tested” and “free from harmful substances”, as well as claims relating to the biological effects of a product.
With the development of generative artificial intelligence and new search engines, cosmetic brands face a dual challenge: strengthening their digital visibility while ensuring the regulatory compliance of the content they publish.
Regulations make no distinction between content written by a marketing team, produced by a communications agency or generated by artificial intelligence. Cosmetic claims must remain accurate, substantiated and compliant with the requirements of the markets in which the products are sold.
EcoMundo helps cosmetic brands secure their communications by ensuring that messages published on packaging, e-commerce websites, social media and advertising materials comply with the applicable regulations.
Drawing on its expertise in cosmetic regulations and claim assessment, EcoMundo helps companies combine marketing performance, digital innovation and regulatory compliance.
In an environment where content is created and published at an increasingly rapid pace, integrating regulatory compliance from the design stage helps limit the risk of misleading communications, reduce corrections after publication and protect brand credibility.
Compliance therefore becomes an essential component of a sustainable digital communication strategy, alongside SEO and GEO initiatives.
With EcoMundo, brands benefit from a regulatory partner that can secure their claims and marketing content while supporting their development across international markets. Contact us so you can comply too!